CADP banner graphic
 

News

Supreme Court News Resources

Supreme Court News Stories from 2003

  • About Broken Links
  • Supreme Court Halt Texas Execution
    HUNTSVILLE, Texas (AP) -- The U.S. Supreme Court halted the execution Wednesday of a condemned inmate who was part of a lawsuit that challenged one of the drugs used to carry out the death sentence. Kevin Lee Zimmerman won his reprieve about 20 minutes before he could have been put to death. (12/10/03, Rocky Mountain News)
  • Justices Hear Death Penalty Case Appeal
    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Monday questioned why Texas officials withheld crucial evidence from the defense in a high-profile death penalty case in Texas. The query renewed long-standing debate about whether capital defendants consistently receive adequate representation and fair treatment from the courts. The case involves Delma Banks. (12/8/03, CNN.com)
  • Supreme Court to Clarify Ruling's Impact
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court said Monday it will clarify the impact of its ruling last year that juries, not a judge, must decide if a convicted killer lives or dies. The high court forced changes in the death penalty laws of five states in 2002 because those states gave judges the final say. But the court did not make clear how its ruling should apply retroactively to inmates already on death row.Lower courts have divided over that question, which affects more than 100 death row inmates, and the Supreme Court has agreed to clear up the confusion. Separately, the court agreed to hear an appeal from an Alabama death row inmate who claims execution by lethal injection would be unconstitutionally cruel because of his medical condition. He is on death row for a 1978 murder. (12/1/03, CNN.com)
  • Court Avoids World Debate on Death Penalty
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Despite the concerns of two justices, the U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to be drawn into an international death penalty debate over the legal rights of a Mexican on Oklahoma's death row. The court was asked to consider whether American prosecutors are violating a 1963 international treaty when they do not notify foreign governments about death penalty cases involving people from their countries. That issue is being debated internationally. (11/17/03, CNN.com)
  • Death Row Inmate Loses Supreme Court Plea
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The Supreme Court Monday rejected an appeal by a death row inmate who argued his constitutional rights had been violated when he was forced to take anti-psychotic drugs that made him mentally competent to be executed. Without any comment, the justices refused to review a federal appeals court ruling that the state does not violate the Constitution by executing an inmate who has regained mental competency through forced medication that is part of appropriate medical care. The case involved Arkansas death row inmate Charles Singleton. (10/6/03, CNN.com)
  • Supreme Court Looking at Death Penalty Instructions
    WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court picked a Pennsylvania shooting rampage case on Tuesday to settle whether dozens of old death sentences should be thrown out because of poorly written jury instructions. Justices will decide if some longtime death row inmates deserve a second chance at life sentences, under their 1988 ruling that set new standards for jury instructions. The court has refused before to consider whether that ruling was retroactive, applying to people already on death row at the time. The justices decided to do so in the case of George E. Banks. (10/1/03, The Daily Camera)
  • Supreme Court Addresses Ineffective Counsel
    A Maryland man will receive a new sentencing hearing after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the performance of his defense counsel did not meet minimum standards as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. ... U.S. Supreme Court heard the Keith Wiggins case after the conservative Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to apply the standard that the Supreme Court set in its 1984 Strickland decision to Wiggins. The Strickland ruling set out minimal standards that defense attorneys must meet when representing their clients in death penalty cases. (6/26/03, NCADP)
  • High Court Will Hear Texas Death Row Inmate's Appeal
    WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court said Monday it will take a fresh look at the quality of lawyers assigned to represent murder defendants and what happens when overworked, lazy or incompetent attorneys fail to do all they can to keep a client off death row. The court agreed to hear the case of Texas' longest-serving death row inmate. The court stepped in to temporarily spare Delma Banks' life minutes before his scheduled execution in March, and will now hear his full appeal. (4/22/03, The Daily Camera)
  • High Court Finds Prosecutors' Race Bias
    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- An African-American man's murder conviction has been thrown into doubt after the Supreme Court Tuesday found Texas prosecutors used "race bias" during jury selection. By an 8-1 margin, the justices ruled district attorneys in Dallas employed "race-based" challenges to exclude 10 of 11 African-Americans eligible to serve as jurors on the 1986 capital murder case. Citing "the prosecution's use of the jury shuffle and the historical evidence of racial discrimination by the Dallas County District Attorney's Office," the court determined Thomas Joe Miller-El's constitutional right to a fair trial had been violated. (2/25/03, CNN.com)
  • Supreme Court Rejects Youth Offender Appeal
    WASHINGTON -- Four Supreme Court justices want to ban the execution of very young killers, but they apparently cannot persuade their colleagues to reopen the debate. The high court did not comment in turning down an appeal Monday from an Oklahoma death row inmate who was 17 when he helped burn a young couple alive in the trunk of their car. Death penalty opponents had hoped the court would use the case to broaden an ongoing review of how the punishment is carried out and who belongs on death row. (1/28/02, The Daily Camera)





News | National News | World News | News Commentary



Website copyright 1999-2008 CADP - Page updated or verified 7/4/05