CADP banner graphic
 

News

Supreme Court News Resources

Supreme Court News Stories from 2004

  • About Broken Links
  • Court to Decide on Access
    WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the federal courts must give a hearing to a Mexican death-row inmate in Texas who says the state violated international law by trying him for murder without first notifying Mexican diplomats who might have helped him. ... The court received friend-of-the court briefs from the European Union, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and Mexico, all urging it to hear the case. Also supporting Medellin's appeal was a group of former U.S. diplomats, including former Iran hostage L. Bruce Laingen, who argued that U.S. citizens abroad will "suffer in kind" if their own courts do not enforce consular access. ... The case accepted for review Friday is Medellin v. Dretke, No. 04-5928. Oral argument will take place in March. A decision is expected by July. (12/11/04, The Daily Camera)
  • Supreme Court to Hear Case Again
    WASHINGTON -- The scene at the Supreme Court as a Texas death penalty case was argued Monday morning was strikingly familiar. The two lawyers who stood before the justices were the same two who argued for the same parties two years ago ... In the intervening two years, the Supreme Court has made clear its growing unease with the administration of the death penalty in Texas and its exasperation with the state and federal courts that hear appeals from the state's death row. The Supreme Court was now taking the unusual step of hearing Miller-El's appeal from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for a second time, and several justices indicated that the concerns they expressed the first time had not been allayed. (12/7/04, The Daily Camera)
  • High Court Debates Teen Executions
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court is considering whether the United States is out of step with the rest of the world, and with national and global standards of decency, by allowing teenage killers to be put to death. ... Juvenile offenders are executed in just a few other countries, including Iran, Pakistan, China and Saudi Arabia. International leaders contend the practice leaves the United States diplomatically isolated and vulnerable to charges of hypocrisy on human rights issues. The Supreme Court has looked increasingly at international opinion, and its four most liberal members have gone on record against a practice they said was "a relic of the past and is inconsistent with evolving standards of decency in a civilized society." (10/13/04, CNN.com)
  • Supreme Court Will Hear Case About Juror Instructions
    The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a death row appeal from a Pennsylvania man who maintains that jurors at his trial should have been told that they had the option of sentencing him to life without parole instead of the death penalty. According to the brief filed on behalf of Ronald Rompilla, the jury asked several questions during his trial about Rompilla's "future dangerousness," yet were never told that if sentenced to prison he would never be eligible for later release. (10/4/04, DPIC Update)
  • Supreme Court: Death Sentences Remain
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court refused Thursday to overturn the death sentences of more than 100 inmates who argued their fates were improperly determined by judges, not jurors. The 5-4 decision spares at least four states from having to decide whether to spend millions of dollars for new sentencing hearings or consent to prison sentences for the convicted killers. ... The 2002 Supreme Court ruling, Ring v. Arizona, forced changes in the death penalty laws of Arizona, Montana, Idaho, Nebraska and Colorado, because those states left it to judges to determine whether a killer should be executed. The ruling also cast doubt on death-sentencing procedures in other states that used a combination of juries and judges to impose death sentences. Had the high court ruled the other way, states would have had to decide whether to pursue death sentences for 85 Arizona inmates and about 25 others in Idaho, Montana and Nebraska. Inmates in other states also could have tried to use the ruling to win new sentences. (6/24/04, CNN.com)
  • Supreme Court Refuses Case of Mentally Ill Convict
    WASHINGTON -- In other action Monday at the U.S. Supreme Court: Refused to consider the appeal of a South Carolina death row inmate convicted of killing two third-graders during a shooting spree at an elementary school in 1988. Mental health groups had urged it to use Jamie Wilson's case to decide if it is unconstitutional for states to execute people who were seriously mentally ill when they committed their crimes. (6/22/04, The Daily Camera)
  • Supreme Court Sides with Alabama Death Inmate
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that a convicted Alabama killer can pursue an appeal claiming lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment in his case. ... Nelson's case had given justices a stark look at how inmates are put to death. ... The court was using Nelson's case (Nelson v. Campbell, 03-6821) to decide a technical question of whether last-minute appeals from death row inmates should be allowed in federal courts. ... Also Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to decide (in Woodford v. Payton, 03-1039) whether a convicted California killer's religious conversion should have been considered by a jury that sentenced him to death. (5/24/04, CNN.com)
  • Justice Condemns Capital Punishment
    U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens told a convention of lawyers and judges in Chicago, "I think this country would be much better off if we did not have capital punishment." Stevens still thinks the death penalty is constitutional. "But I really think it's a very unfortunate part of our judicial system and I would feel much, much better if more states would really consider whether they think the benefits outweigh the very serious potential injustice, because in these cases the emotions are very, very high on both sides and to have stakes as high as you do in these cases, there is the special potential for error," he said. ... Stevens' statement at the 7th Circuit Bar Association dinner in Chicago on Monday appears to be the most pronounced statement against capital punishment made by a Supreme Court justice since the late Harry Blackmun wrote in 1994: "From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death." (5/12/04, NCADP)
  • Supreme Court Hears Execution Arguments
    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court used the case of Alabama death row inmate David Larry Nelson for a stark discussion Monday about execution methods, and whether federal judges can consider last-minute challenges to punishment. The case is Nelson v. Campbell, case no. 03-6821. (3/29/04, CNN.com)
  • High Court Reverses Inmate's Death Penalty
    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Supreme Court justices Tuesday ruled Texas prosecutors withheld evidence from defense lawyers and reversed the death penalty for a man who at one time was minutes away from execution. The case renewed a long-standing debate over whether capital defendants consistently receive adequate representation and fair treatment from the courts. Writing for a 7-2 majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, "When police or prosecutors conceal significant exculpatory or impeaching material, we hold, it is ordinarily incumbent on the state to set the record straight." In a rare move, justices on March 13, 2003, halted Delma Banks' scheduled execution 10 minutes before he was to receive a lethal injection. (2/25/04, CNN.com)
  • Supreme Court Revisits Execution of Teens
    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Monday agreed to again decide the constitutionality of executing people who were juveniles at the time they committed murder. The justices will consider the Missouri case of Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time of a murder-robbery. The state Supreme Court overturned his death sentence last year, saying the execution of those under 18 violated the Constitution's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." (1/26/04, CNN.com)



    News | National News | World News | News Commentary



Website copyright 1999-2008 CADP - Page updated or verified 7/4/05