CADP banner graphic
 

News Commentary Archive from 2009

  • Archive of News Commentary
    See all CADP News Commentary links and excerpts from the years 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008.
  • About Broken Links
  • There is No "Humane" Execution
    This is what passes for progress in the application of the death penalty: Kenneth Biros, a convicted murderer, was put to death in Ohio last week with one drug, instead of the more common three-drug cocktail. ... The larger problem, however, is that changing a lethal-injection method is simply an attempt, as Justice Harry Blackmun put it, to “tinker with the machinery of death.” No matter how it is done, for the state to put someone to death is inherently barbaric. (12/13/09, Editorial by the New York Times)
  • Pulling the Plug on Capital Punishment
    Not all the important turning points in America's epic struggle over the death penalty get noticed immediately by the mass media and the public. A quiet blockbuster this year was the decision of the American Law Institute, a little-known but prestigious organization of lawyers and judges, to withdraw its approval for the standards created by the institute's 1963 Model Penal Code to guide juries in the choice between long prison terms and execution. (12/7/09, The National Law Journal. News commentary by Franklin E. Zimring.)
  • Selective Empathy
    In overturning a death sentence this week of a Korean War veteran whose lawyer failed to inform the jury about the man’s combat-related traumatic stress disorder, the Supreme Court drew cheers from veterans’ groups and death-penalty opponents. But it also raised a question: Is selective empathy better than no empathy at all? (12/3/98, New York Times. News commentary by Linda Greenhouse.)
  • Death Penalty Just Too Costly
    There are many troubling questions about the death penalty. There are questions of racial disparities. There are questions of the mentally ill. There are questions of mistakes. This newspaper has long supported the death penalty. Polls show overwhelming support for it. Opposing the death penalty is not a popular position. But, I am opposed to the death penalty. Morally, I don't think the state should kill people. But I also don't think the death penalty is practical. It is not a deterrent to crime. It takes so long that any idea of timely justice is lost. (11/1/09, Clarion-Ledger. News commentary by D. Hampton, Editorial Director.)
  • The Price of Death
    Even in states where executions are carried out as planned, the often grisly circumstances lead some people to wonder why the United States supports the death penalty, one of the few developed countries that still does so. ... It is time for the nation to conclude once and for all that in our civilized society there is no place for capital punishmennt. (10/26/09, Editorial by America Magazine.)
  • Judge Says Death Penalty "Too Fraught with Variables to Survive"
    Retired Federal Appeals Court Judge H. Lee Sarokin recently offered a harsh critique of the death penalty, especially challenging the botched execution attempt of Romell Broom in Ohio in September. Citing morality, arbitrariness, and the dim prospects of closure for the murder victims’ families, Judge Sarokin called the imposition of the death penalty an erratic and flawed process that should not be permitted to continue. (10/19/09, DPIC Update)
  • Botched Executions
    Ohio's attempt to execute Romell Broom last month by lethal injection was the death penalty at its most barbaric. Even after that horribly botched failed execution, the state wants to continue putting people to death, starting next week. Ohio should at the very least call a moratorium so it can ensure that it has the technical competence to put people to death humanely. But every state should use this shameful moment to question whether they ought to be putting people to death at all. (10/3/09, Editorial by the New York Times)
  • Death for the Death Penalty?
    In theory, the death penalty for capital crimes should work. An accused killer takes the life of an innocent and is put to death to protect the rest of society. The only problem is that theory has little to do with real life. Prejudicial prosecution; coerced confessions; corrupted informants; botched lawyering; and, yes, even racism, have turned the death penalty, as it is now applied in the United States, into a very dirty, inaccurate business. (9/24/09, Black Voices - Black Spin)
  • High Cost of Death Row
    To the many excellent reasons to abolish the death penalty - it's immoral, does not deter murder and affects minorities disproportionately - we can add one more. It's an economic drain on governments with already badly depleted budgets. It is far from a national trend, but some legislators have begun to have second thoughts about the high cost of death row. Others would do well to consider evidence gathered by the Death Penalty Information Center, a research organization that opposes capital punishment. (9/27/09, Editorial by the New York Times)
  • NCADP Launches "Shouting from the Rooftops" Campaign
    In 2006, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that there has not been "a single case - not one - in which it is clear that a person was executed for a crime he did not commit. If such an event had occurred in recent years, we would not have to hunt for it; the innocent's name would be shouted from the rooftops." So to raise awareness about Cameron Todd Willingham, who was innocent yet executed, the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP) is now "Shouting from the Rooftops." Learn more. (9/24/09, CADP)
  • Innocent Until Executed
    For years, death-penalty opponents and supporters have been working their way toward a moment in which each side would rethink things. They were seeking a case in which a clearly innocent defendant was wrongly put to death. (9/3/08, Newsweek. News commentary by Dahlia Lithwick.)
  • Reaction to Execution of Innocent Man Grows
    Recent scientific reports indicating that Texas likely executed an innocent man have spurred wide coverage and commentary. Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in 2004 for the arson murder of his three children. Fire experts now say the blaze was likely an accident. Read excerpts from coverage. (9/8/09, DPIC Update)
  • Former Death Row Warden Discusses the Impact of Executions
    In the video, Dean Ault discusses the tremendous drain that carrying out executions had, and continues to have, on his life. He added, "I know I'm not the only one who has administered executions that felt the way I do. They all have shed a lot of tears." He questions the value of the death penalty, and recognizes the difficulty that many politicians have in challenging this punishment, despite its obvious flaws. (8/24/09, DPIC Update)
  • Restrictions on Death Penalty Appeals Raising Judges' Concerns
    A number of federal judges have recently written strong dissents in capital cases because they were concerned that restrictions on appeals could lead to tragic mistakes. Judge William Fletcher of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, for example, began his dissent in the case of Kevin Cooper with the words, "The State of California may be about to execute an innocent man." According to a study by the New York Times, such concerns have risen recently. "In dozens of capital cases in recent years, appeals court judges, some of whom have ruled in favor of the death penalty many times, have complained that Congress and the Supreme Court have raised daunting barriers for death row prisoners to appeal their convictions, and in many cases the judges have taken on their colleagues." (8/17/09, DPIC Update)
  • Browse Multimedia Resources on the Death Penalty
    The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) maintains a Multimedia Resources page. This Web page organizes numerous links to audio files, podcasts, and videos. Videos include interviews with death row prisoners, case studies, commentaries, and so on. Podcasts cover a variety of topics: arbitrariness in the application of the death penalty, clemency, cost of the death penalty, and the issue of deterrence. The DPIC page also includes links to many additional audio and video clips. These links are to multimedia resources available from organizations such as the BBC, NPR, PBS, and various commercial news outlets. Visit the DPIC Multimedia Resources page. (8/10/09, CADP)
  • Documentary Tells Story of Innocent Man Who Spent 18 Years on Death Row
    In 1984, Juan Melendez was sent to Florida's death row for the murder of Delbert Baker even though no physical evidence linked him to the crime. In 2002, he was released with all charges vacated after it was found that prosecutors had withheld critical evidence in the case. ... Juan Melendez - 6446 is a documentary released as part of the HBO-sponsored 10th Annual New York International Latino Film Festival. Director Luis Rosario Albert tells Melendez' story through his own words and the words of his family, friends and lawyers - the story of a migrant Puerto Rican farm worker sent to death row for a crime he didn't commit. Editor's note: Juan Melendez spoke at 2004 CADP events. (8/3/09, DPIC Update)
  • Senator Kennedy Raises Concerns About Expansion of Federal Death Penalty
    In response to an amendment to the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act that would add the death penalty as a punishment for certain offenses under the Act, Senator Edward Kennedy (MA) entered a statement into the Congressional Record highlighting some of the risks of the death penalty. An excerpt of his statement: "I stand firmly in opposition to any new legislation that would radically expand the use of the death penalty, and I urge my colleagues in the Senate to oppose the Sessions amendment because it adds another new death penalty to the Federal Criminal Code. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the 1970s, the Death Penalty Information Center has reported that 135 people have been released from death row in the United States because of innocence - approximately one exoneration for every nine executions." (7/27/09, DPIC Update)
  • "Double Tragedies": Mental Illness and the Death Penalty
    A new report, "Double Tragedies," addresses the question of whether people with severe mental illness should face the death penalty. The report was authored by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) and Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights (MVFHR) and called for treatment and prevention instead of execution for such offenders. (7/20/09, DPIC Update)
  • Save Troy Anthony Davis: Georgia is Set to Execute a Man Who May Well Be Innocent
    The State of Georgia has been trying to execute Troy Anthony Davis for more than 15 years, despite compelling evidence that he did not commit the murder for which he is sentenced to die. Davis has been to death's door three times - most recently, he was 90 minutes from execution - rescued each time by heroic lawyering. But his luck may be running out. A 30-day stay of execution expires this weekend, prompting Amnesty International and other human rights groups to declare Tuesday a global day of action - a time for those who hate injustice to raise our voices and save this man's life. You can get details of protests, poetry readings, letter-writing campaigns and information about the case at www.aiusa.org/troy or by texting "Troy" to 90999. (5/17/09, New York Daily News. News commentary by Errol Louis.)
  • Jurors Already Killed the Death Penalty
    In its final hours this week, the legislature killed a controversial bill that would have done away with the death penalty in Colorado. The outcry over its defeat (by one vote in the Senate) has been passionate. But the reality is that the death penalty has been functionally dead in this state for many years, in part because juries have been reluctant to impose it. That point came home to me in a very personal way when I was called in February to appear for jury duty in the trial of Robert Ray. On Thursday, an Arapahoe County jury found Ray guilty of the first-degree murder of two young people who were set to testify against him in another murder trial. That jury will now decide whether to sentence him to death. (5/9/09, The Denver Post. News commentary by Susan Thornton.)
  • Time To Kill the Death Penalty
    Even justice has a price tag, and in today’s times, when legislators were talking about cutting $500 million from higher education, we have to make tough choices on the kind of justice we’d like to pursue. We think the Colorado House made the right decision when it decided to kill the death penalty and use the money toward solving cold cases. We understand perfectly why families of victims would want to see the ones who caused them so much pain put to death. But in these times, we simply can’t afford it. The death penalty is a luxury. The last death-penalty case tried in Colorado cost $1.4 million to prosecute. It costs around $70,000 to prosecute a non-capital case. You can do the math. (4/30/09, Editorial by the Greeley Tribune)
  • Eliminating Death Penalty in Colorado the Right Move
    Count us among those applauding the Colorado House's close-as-a-shave vote to eliminate the death penalty here. The bill, which now goes to the state Senate, would take money used for death penalty cases and apply it toward solving cold cases. ... We hope it does pass in the Senate, and we hope the governor signs it. For the grieving friends and families of more than 1,400 Coloradans, that expanded chance for justice outweighs the desire for ultimate revenge on a very few, who will spend the rest of their days in prison where they belong. (4/23/09, Editorial by The Camera)
  • Ending the Death Penalty - A Spiritual Perspective!
    Audio interview: http://latalkradio.com/images/Nanice-021609.mp3 (2/16/09, LATalkRadio.com)
  • Editorials: Death Row Futility - The Death Penalty Is Wrong; Decrying Long Stays On Death Row Is Beside The Point
    And those duration-of-stay numbers merely strengthen our opposition. We find it shocking and depressing that California keeps hundreds of people locked up for decades awaiting execution at an estimated additional cost of $63.3 million per year (over and above the normal cost of incarceration) when it could save more than 90% of that by scrapping the system entirely and replacing it with life imprisonment without parole. ... Inefficiency and costliness are obviously only a small part of what's wrong with the death penalty. But as the commission noted, they create cynicism and disrespect for the rule of law, and increase the emotional trauma of victims' families. Let's end this brutal, anachronistic practice. (2/23/09, Los Angels Times)
  • Editorials: Death Penalty Moratorium Needed in Texas
    The Dallas Morning News renewed its call for a moratorium on executions in Texas because of the numerous errors in the state's death penalty system. ... These and other problems have led the Dallas Morning News to change its 100-year position and oppose the death penalty completely. " It's the view of this newspaper that the justice system will never be foolproof and, therefore, use of the death penalty is never justified." (1/5/09, DPIC Update)
  • Editorials: Washington Post Calls for an End to Capital Punishment in Maryland
    A recent editorial in the Washington Post cited trends and statistics from DPIC's 2008 Year End Report in calling for an end to the death penalty in Maryland. The paper urged Maryland lawmakers to "heed the march of history" and noted that use of the death penalty is declining around the country. (1/5/09, DPIC Update)





News | National News | World News


Website copyright 1999-2012 CADP - Page updated or verified 12/14/2009